[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <38482b1b-b1c7-bb41-b086-6ce00f6a9d1d@grimberg.me>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:39:01 -0700
From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: axboe@...com, hch@....de, baolin.wang7@...il.com,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] nvme: Add Arbitration Burst support
>> From the NVMe spec, "In order to make efficient use of the non-volatile
>> memory, it is often advantageous to execute multiple commands from a
>> Submission Queue in parallel. For Submission Queues that are using
>> weighted round robin with urgent priority class or round robin
>> arbitration, host software may configure an Arbitration Burst setting".
>> Thus add Arbitration Burst setting support.
>
> But if the user changed it to something else that better matches how
> they want to use queues, the driver is just going to undo that setting
> on the next reset.
Where do we do priority class arbitration? no one sets it
Powered by blists - more mailing lists