[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200623064056.GA8121@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:40:56 +1000
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
LTP List <ltp@...ts.linux.it>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
Jan Stancek <jstancek@...hat.com>, chrubis <chrubis@...e.cz>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: LTP: crypto: af_alg02 regression on linux-next 20200621 tag
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 11:53:43AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>
> Thanks for the investigation.
> After reverting, two test cases got PASS out of four reported failure cases.
> ltp-crypto-tests:
> * af_alg02 - still failing - Hung and time out
> * af_alg05 - still failing - Hung and time out
> ltp-syscalls-tests:
> * keyctl07 - PASS
> * request_key03 - PASS
>
> Please suggest the way to debug / fix the af_alg02 and af_alg05 failures.
Did you clear the MSG_MORE flag in the final send(2) call before
you call recv(2)?
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists