[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200623073220.GV30139@dragon>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:32:21 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-imx@....com,
Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@...wei.com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ARM: imx6: add missing put_device() call in imx6q_suspend_init()
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 12:15:32PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> Do you find a previous update suggestion useful?
> >>
> >> ARM: imx6: Add missing put_device() call in imx6q_suspend_init()
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/5acd7308-f6e1-4b1e-c744-bb2e5fdca1be@web.de/
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1151158/
> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/11/9/125
> …
> > It is useful indeed.
>
> Thanks for your positive feedback.
>
>
> > Although I didn't run cocci script, since it can produce too many false result
> > which is hard to filter out.
>
> Would you like to clarify any corresponding software analysis options?
>
>
> > BTW, I see you haver done the work already, I guess I won't send any patches
> > related to 'missing put_device after of_find_device_by_node()'.
>
> You may continue also with contributions in such a direction.
> I would like to point out that other developers occasionally got into the mood
> to improve implementation details in similar ways already.
>
>
> > Any idea why these pathes didn't get applied ?
>
> I can make assumptions about the reasons for the possibly questionable handling
> of such patches.
Markus,
Could you resend it to my kernel.org address?
Shawn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists