[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5300cb30-2243-9bfe-125c-96e720cd1f29@web.de>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:48:52 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-imx@....com
Cc: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>, Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@...wei.com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ARM: imx6: add missing put_device() call in imx6q_suspend_init()
>>>> Do you find a previous update suggestion useful?
>>>>
>>>> ARM: imx6: Add missing put_device() call in imx6q_suspend_init()
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/5acd7308-f6e1-4b1e-c744-bb2e5fdca1be@web.de/
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1151158/
>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/11/9/125
>> …
>>> It is useful indeed.
…
>>> Any idea why these pathes didn't get applied ?
>>
>> I can make assumptions about the reasons for the possibly questionable handling
>> of such patches.
>
> Markus,
>
> Could you resend it to my kernel.org address?
You can get relevant information from the referenced message archive interfaces,
can't you?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists