[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9f429c51-0fa9-16dc-4d62-d456551c5376@web.de>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:00:09 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-imx@....com
Cc: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>, Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@...wei.com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ARM: imx6: add missing put_device() call in imx6q_suspend_init()
>>>>>> Do you find a previous update suggestion useful?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ARM: imx6: Add missing put_device() call in imx6q_suspend_init()
>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/5acd7308-f6e1-4b1e-c744-bb2e5fdca1be@web.de/
>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1151158/
>>>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/11/9/125
…
>> You can get relevant information from the referenced message archive interfaces,
>> can't you?
>
> Well, I'm asking you to resend to make sure the following:
>
> - Use correct maintainer mailbox address.
Were the selected message recipients appropriate at 2019-11-09?
> - You still care about the patch.
Partly, yes.
> - The patch applies to v5.8-rc.
Would you like to try it out if my proposal is still valid?
Does the change approach by Yu Kuai supersede it?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists