linux-kernel - Re: ARM: imx6: add missing put_device() call in imx6q_suspend

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200623120919.GE30139@dragon>
Date:   Tue, 23 Jun 2020 20:09:20 +0800
From:   Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
To:     Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc:     kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-imx@....com, Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>,
        Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@...wei.com>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ARM: imx6: add missing put_device() call in imx6q_suspend_init()

On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 02:00:09PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> >>>>>> Do you find a previous update suggestion useful?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ARM: imx6: Add missing put_device() call in imx6q_suspend_init()
> >>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/5acd7308-f6e1-4b1e-c744-bb2e5fdca1be@web.de/
> >>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1151158/
> >>>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/11/9/125
> …
> >> You can get relevant information from the referenced message archive interfaces,
> >> can't you?
> >
> > Well, I'm asking you to resend to make sure the following:
> >
> >  - Use correct maintainer mailbox address.
> 
> Were the selected message recipients appropriate at 2019-11-09?

At least, my mailbox was not.

> 
> 
> >  - You still care about the patch.
> 
> Partly, yes.
> 
> 
> >  - The patch applies to v5.8-rc.
> 
> Would you like to try it out if my proposal is still valid?
> 
> Does the change approach by Yu Kuai supersede it?