[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200624182839.GI9247@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 11:28:39 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH linux-next] refperf: __srcu_struct_srcu_refctl_scale
can be static
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 01:47:09AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
This gets me the following from gcc version 7.5.0:
kernel/rcu/refscale.c:162:1: error: duplicate ‘static’
static DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU(srcu_refctl_scale);
^~~~~~
Is the concern the __srcu_struct_srcu_refctl_scale that is defined
as non-static? Last I checked, non-static was required in order for
the ___srcu_struct_ptrs mechanism to correctly allocate the needed
per-CPU data.
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> refscale.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/refscale.c b/kernel/rcu/refscale.c
> index d9291f883b5428..4097b53867b33d 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/refscale.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/refscale.c
> @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static struct ref_scale_ops rcu_ops = {
> };
>
> // Definitions for SRCU ref scale testing.
> -DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU(srcu_refctl_scale);
> +static DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU(srcu_refctl_scale);
> static struct srcu_struct *srcu_ctlp = &srcu_refctl_scale;
>
> static void srcu_ref_scale_read_section(const int nloops)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists