[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200624122242.GA6270@willie-the-truck>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 13:22:42 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Cc: Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-tegra <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 24 [build failure on arm64]
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 12:57:23PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On 24/06/2020 11:55, Will Deacon wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile
> > index 1e5a940532da..97d3d3632093 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile
> > @@ -23,8 +23,9 @@ btildflags-$(CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNEL) += -z force-bti
> > # potential future proofing if we end up with internal calls to the exported
> > # routines, as x86 does (see 6f121e548f83 ("x86, vdso: Reimplement vdso.so
> > # preparation in build-time C")).
> > -ldflags-y := -shared -nostdlib -soname=linux-vdso.so.1 --hash-style=sysv \
> > - -Bsymbolic --no-eh-frame-hdr --build-id -n $(btildflags-y) -T
> > +ldflags-y := -shared -nostdlib -soname=linux-vdso.so.1 --hash-style=sysv \
> > + -Bsymbolic $(call ld-option, --no-eh-frame-hdr) --build-id -n \
> > + $(btildflags-y) -T
> >
> > ccflags-y := -fno-common -fno-builtin -fno-stack-protector -ffixed-x18
> > ccflags-y += -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING
> >
>
>
> I am seeing the same build failure and the above does fix it for me.
Cheers, Jon. I'll get this into -next with your Tested-by.
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists