[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a7ebe7c1-49ae-5bc9-9c4f-fcc693ca3834@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 13:29:00 +0100
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
CC: Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-tegra <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 24 [build failure on arm64]
On 24/06/2020 13:22, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 12:57:23PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> On 24/06/2020 11:55, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile
>>> index 1e5a940532da..97d3d3632093 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile
>>> @@ -23,8 +23,9 @@ btildflags-$(CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNEL) += -z force-bti
>>> # potential future proofing if we end up with internal calls to the exported
>>> # routines, as x86 does (see 6f121e548f83 ("x86, vdso: Reimplement vdso.so
>>> # preparation in build-time C")).
>>> -ldflags-y := -shared -nostdlib -soname=linux-vdso.so.1 --hash-style=sysv \
>>> - -Bsymbolic --no-eh-frame-hdr --build-id -n $(btildflags-y) -T
>>> +ldflags-y := -shared -nostdlib -soname=linux-vdso.so.1 --hash-style=sysv \
>>> + -Bsymbolic $(call ld-option, --no-eh-frame-hdr) --build-id -n \
>>> + $(btildflags-y) -T
>>>
>>> ccflags-y := -fno-common -fno-builtin -fno-stack-protector -ffixed-x18
>>> ccflags-y += -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING
>>>
>>
>>
>> I am seeing the same build failure and the above does fix it for me.
>
> Cheers, Jon. I'll get this into -next with your Tested-by.
Thanks, that will be great.
Jon
--
nvpublic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists