[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB3PR0402MB391634C85F53E8A9456E89F0F5950@DB3PR0402MB3916.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 13:15:36 +0000
From: Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>
To: Franck Lenormand <franck.lenormand@....com>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
"bjorn.andersson@...aro.org" <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>,
"vkoul@...nel.org" <vkoul@...nel.org>,
"geert+renesas@...der.be" <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
"olof@...om.net" <olof@...om.net>,
Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>,
Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>, "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"krzk@...nel.org" <krzk@...nel.org>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] firmware: imx: Move i.MX SCU soc driver into SCU firmware
driver
Hi, Franck/Arnd
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] firmware: imx: Move i.MX SCU soc driver into SCU
> firmware driver
>
> Hello,
>
> The move of folder is a good idea however I do not feel adding the code of
> soc-imx-scu.c to imx-scu.c is the best.
> Until now imx-scu.c was focused on exchanging the RPC and init the IRQ.
> Why not have soc-imx-scu.c copied to imx-scu-soc.c (change filename) to
> have a pattern similar to imx-scu-irq? And keep the imx_scu_soc_init into
> imx-scu.c.
>
Sound like making sense to me, it can make the code architecture more clear.
Hi, Arnd
What do you think?
Thanks,
Anson
Powered by blists - more mailing lists