[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200624131921.GB9972@mwanda>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 16:19:21 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH] intel_idle: Fix uninitialized variable bug
The "tick" variable isn't initialized if "lapic_timer_always_reliable"
is true.
Fixes: 40ab82e08d78 ("intel_idle: Simplify LAPIC timer reliability checks")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
---
drivers/idle/intel_idle.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c b/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
index aae53e650638..6c9152f303a6 100644
--- a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
+++ b/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ static __cpuidle int intel_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
struct cpuidle_state *state = &drv->states[index];
unsigned long eax = flg2MWAIT(state->flags);
unsigned long ecx = 1; /* break on interrupt flag */
- bool tick;
+ bool tick = false;
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
/*
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists