[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hG2FL0VSeE+ind9MSMc_c7nA4KjKxFPdMhVOPrMdYJKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 15:41:05 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel_idle: Fix uninitialized variable bug
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 3:19 PM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> The "tick" variable isn't initialized if "lapic_timer_always_reliable"
> is true.
If lapic_timer_always_reliable is true, then
static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARAT) must also be true AFAICS.
So the lapic_timer_always_reliable check in there looks redundant.
> Fixes: 40ab82e08d78 ("intel_idle: Simplify LAPIC timer reliability checks")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> ---
> drivers/idle/intel_idle.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c b/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
> index aae53e650638..6c9152f303a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
> +++ b/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
> @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ static __cpuidle int intel_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> struct cpuidle_state *state = &drv->states[index];
> unsigned long eax = flg2MWAIT(state->flags);
> unsigned long ecx = 1; /* break on interrupt flag */
> - bool tick;
> + bool tick = false;
> int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>
> /*
> --
Powered by blists - more mailing lists