linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] intel_idle: Fix uninitialized variable bug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200625090449.GA2549@kadam>
Date:   Thu, 25 Jun 2020 12:04:49 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel_idle: Fix uninitialized variable bug

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 03:41:05PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 3:19 PM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
> >
> > The "tick" variable isn't initialized if "lapic_timer_always_reliable"
> > is true.
> 
> If lapic_timer_always_reliable is true, then
> static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARAT) must also be true AFAICS.
> 
> So the lapic_timer_always_reliable check in there looks redundant.

Can the lapic_timer_always_reliable variable just be removed entirely
and replaced with an static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARAT) check?

regards,
dan carpenter