[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200625130624.GC1036@mail-personal>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 16:06:24 +0300
From: Ferdinand Blomqvist <ferdinand.blomqvist@...il.com>
To: Aiden Leong <aiden.leong@...sd.com>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] Reed-Solomon Code: Update no_eras to the actual number
of errors
Hi!
On 2020-06-25 00:36:01, Aiden Leong wrote:
>Corr and eras_pos are updated to actual correction pattern and erasure
>positions, but no_eras is not.
>
>When this library is used to recover lost bytes, we normally memset the
>lost trunk of bytes to zero as a placeholder. Unfortunately, if the lost
>byte is zero, b[i] is zero too. Without correct no_eras, users won't be
>able to determine the valid length of corr and eras_pos.
>
>Signed-off-by: Aiden Leong <aiden.leong@...sd.com>
I'm not sure I understand what you try to do. decode_rs* already returns
the number of errors correted (or something negative upon failure). So
your last statment is false. The lengt of corr and eras_pos is returned
by the function. So this change is unnecessary. More comments inline.
>
>diff --git a/lib/reed_solomon/decode_rs.c b/lib/reed_solomon/decode_rs.c
>index 805de84ae83d..44136ea33d16 100644
>--- a/lib/reed_solomon/decode_rs.c
>+++ b/lib/reed_solomon/decode_rs.c
>@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> int count = 0;
> int num_corrected;
> uint16_t msk = (uint16_t) rs->nn;
>+ int no_eras_local = no_eras ? *no_eras : 0;
>
> /*
> * The decoder buffers are in the rs control struct. They are
>@@ -106,11 +107,11 @@
> memset(&lambda[1], 0, nroots * sizeof(lambda[0]));
> lambda[0] = 1;
>
>- if (no_eras > 0) {
>+ if (no_eras_local > 0) {
> /* Init lambda to be the erasure locator polynomial */
> lambda[1] = alpha_to[rs_modnn(rs,
> prim * (nn - 1 - (eras_pos[0] + pad)))];
>- for (i = 1; i < no_eras; i++) {
>+ for (i = 1; i < no_eras_local; i++) {
> u = rs_modnn(rs, prim * (nn - 1 - (eras_pos[i] + pad)));
> for (j = i + 1; j > 0; j--) {
> tmp = index_of[lambda[j - 1]];
>@@ -129,8 +130,8 @@
> * Begin Berlekamp-Massey algorithm to determine error+erasure
> * locator polynomial
> */
>- r = no_eras;
>- el = no_eras;
>+ r = no_eras_local;
>+ el = no_eras_local;
> while (++r <= nroots) { /* r is the step number */
> /* Compute discrepancy at the r-th step in poly-form */
> discr_r = 0;
>@@ -158,8 +159,8 @@
> } else
> t[i + 1] = lambda[i + 1];
> }
>- if (2 * el <= r + no_eras - 1) {
>- el = r + no_eras - el;
>+ if (2 * el <= r + no_eras_local - 1) {
>+ el = r + no_eras_local - el;
> /*
> * 2 lines below: B(x) <-- inv(discr_r) *
> * lambda(x)
>@@ -312,14 +313,21 @@
> eras_pos[j++] = loc[i] - pad;
> }
> }
>+ if (no_eras)
>+ *no_eras = j;
At this point j will be equal to num_corrected. So why return this
information in no_eras, when it is already returned by the function?
> } else if (data && par) {
> /* Apply error to data and parity */
>+ j = 0;
> for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> if (loc[i] < (nn - nroots))
> data[loc[i] - pad] ^= b[i];
> else
> par[loc[i] - pad - len] ^= b[i];
>+ if (b[i])
>+ j++;
> }
>+ if (no_eras)
>+ *no_eras = j;
Same as above.
>2.25.1
>
Best,
Ferdinand
--
Ferdinand Blomqvist
ferdinand.blomqvist[at]gmail.com
GPG key: 9EFB 7A2C 0432 4EC5 32BA FA61 CFE9 4164 93E8 B9E4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists