linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2] io-wq: return next work from ->do

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 25 Jun 2020 18:20:54 +0300
From:   Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] io-wq: return next work from ->do_work() directly

It's easier to return next work from ->do_work() than
having an in-out argument. Looks nicer and easier to compile.
Also, merge io_wq_assign_next() into its only user.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
---
 fs/io-wq.c    |  8 +++-----
 fs/io-wq.h    |  2 +-
 fs/io_uring.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io-wq.c b/fs/io-wq.c
index 47c5f3aeb460..72f759e1d6eb 100644
--- a/fs/io-wq.c
+++ b/fs/io-wq.c
@@ -523,9 +523,8 @@ static void io_worker_handle_work(struct io_worker *worker)
 				work->flags |= IO_WQ_WORK_CANCEL;
 
 			hash = io_get_work_hash(work);
-			linked = old_work = work;
-			wq->do_work(&linked);
-			linked = (old_work == linked) ? NULL : linked;
+			old_work = work;
+			linked = wq->do_work(work);
 
 			work = next_hashed;
 			if (!work && linked && !io_wq_is_hashed(linked)) {
@@ -781,8 +780,7 @@ static void io_run_cancel(struct io_wq_work *work, struct io_wqe *wqe)
 		struct io_wq_work *old_work = work;
 
 		work->flags |= IO_WQ_WORK_CANCEL;
-		wq->do_work(&work);
-		work = (work == old_work) ? NULL : work;
+		work = wq->do_work(work);
 		wq->free_work(old_work);
 	} while (work);
 }
diff --git a/fs/io-wq.h b/fs/io-wq.h
index 04239dfb12b0..114f12ec2d65 100644
--- a/fs/io-wq.h
+++ b/fs/io-wq.h
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static inline struct io_wq_work *wq_next_work(struct io_wq_work *work)
 }
 
 typedef void (free_work_fn)(struct io_wq_work *);
-typedef void (io_wq_work_fn)(struct io_wq_work **);
+typedef struct io_wq_work *(io_wq_work_fn)(struct io_wq_work *);
 
 struct io_wq_data {
 	struct user_struct *user;
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index e7b1e696fecd..62130dfbc0e7 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -884,7 +884,6 @@ enum io_mem_account {
 	ACCT_PINNED,
 };
 
-static void io_wq_submit_work(struct io_wq_work **workptr);
 static void io_cqring_fill_event(struct io_kiocb *req, long res);
 static void io_put_req(struct io_kiocb *req);
 static void __io_double_put_req(struct io_kiocb *req);
@@ -1623,20 +1622,6 @@ static void io_free_req(struct io_kiocb *req)
 		io_queue_async_work(nxt);
 }
 
-static void io_wq_assign_next(struct io_wq_work **workptr, struct io_kiocb *nxt)
-{
-	struct io_kiocb *link;
-	const struct io_op_def *def = &io_op_defs[nxt->opcode];
-
-	if ((nxt->flags & REQ_F_ISREG) && def->hash_reg_file)
-		io_wq_hash_work(&nxt->work, file_inode(nxt->file));
-
-	*workptr = &nxt->work;
-	link = io_prep_linked_timeout(nxt);
-	if (link)
-		nxt->flags |= REQ_F_QUEUE_TIMEOUT;
-}
-
 /*
  * Drop reference to request, return next in chain (if there is one) if this
  * was the last reference to this request.
@@ -1656,24 +1641,29 @@ static void io_put_req(struct io_kiocb *req)
 		io_free_req(req);
 }
 
-static void io_steal_work(struct io_kiocb *req,
-			  struct io_wq_work **workptr)
+static struct io_wq_work *io_steal_work(struct io_kiocb *req)
 {
+	struct io_kiocb *link, *nxt = NULL;
+
 	/*
-	 * It's in an io-wq worker, so there always should be at least
-	 * one reference, which will be dropped in io_put_work() just
-	 * after the current handler returns.
-	 *
-	 * It also means, that if the counter dropped to 1, then there is
-	 * no asynchronous users left, so it's safe to steal the next work.
+	 * A ref is owned by io-wq in which context we're. So, if that's the
+	 * last one, it's safe to steal next work. False negatives are Ok,
+	 * it just will be re-punted async in io_put_work()
 	 */
-	if (refcount_read(&req->refs) == 1) {
-		struct io_kiocb *nxt = NULL;
+	if (refcount_read(&req->refs) != 1)
+		return NULL;
 
-		io_req_find_next(req, &nxt);
-		if (nxt)
-			io_wq_assign_next(workptr, nxt);
-	}
+	io_req_find_next(req, &nxt);
+	if (!nxt)
+		return NULL;
+
+	if ((nxt->flags & REQ_F_ISREG) && io_op_defs[nxt->opcode].hash_reg_file)
+		io_wq_hash_work(&nxt->work, file_inode(nxt->file));
+
+	link = io_prep_linked_timeout(nxt);
+	if (link)
+		nxt->flags |= REQ_F_QUEUE_TIMEOUT;
+	return &nxt->work;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -5631,9 +5621,8 @@ static void io_arm_async_linked_timeout(struct io_kiocb *req)
 	io_queue_linked_timeout(link);
 }
 
-static void io_wq_submit_work(struct io_wq_work **workptr)
+static struct io_wq_work *io_wq_submit_work(struct io_wq_work *work)
 {
-	struct io_wq_work *work = *workptr;
 	struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(work, struct io_kiocb, work);
 	int ret = 0;
 
@@ -5665,7 +5654,7 @@ static void io_wq_submit_work(struct io_wq_work **workptr)
 		io_put_req(req);
 	}
 
-	io_steal_work(req, workptr);
+	return io_steal_work(req);
 }
 
 static inline struct file *io_file_from_index(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
-- 
2.24.0