[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200626.134035.2092614267932258749.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 13:40:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: brgl@...ev.pl
Cc: andrew@...n.ch, f.fainelli@...il.com, hkallweit1@...il.com,
linux@...linux.org.uk, kuba@...nel.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bgolaszewski@...libre.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] net: phy: relax PHY and MDIO reset handling
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 17:53:19 +0200
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>
> Previously these patches were submitted as part of a larger series[1]
> but since the approach in it will have to be reworked I'm resending
> the ones that were non-controversial and have been reviewed for upstream.
>
> Florian suggested a better solution for managing multiple resets. While
> I will definitely try to implement something at the driver model's bus
> level (together with regulator support), the 'resets' and 'reset-gpios'
> DT property is a stable ABI defined in mdio.yaml so improving its support
> is in order as we'll have to stick with it anyway. Current implementation
> contains an unnecessary limitation where drivers without probe() can't
> define resets.
>
> Changes from the previous version:
> - order forward declarations in patch 4 alphabetically
> - collect review tags
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/22/253
Series applied, thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists