[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200626094450.GJ4800@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 11:44:50 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radeed.org>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Jacob Jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
x86 <x86@...nel.org>, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/12] x86/traps: Fix up invalid PASID
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 01:17:22PM -0700, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> +static bool fixup_pasid_exception(void)
> +{
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM))
> + return false;
> + if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ENQCMD))
> + return false;
elsewhere you had another variation:
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM))
+ return;
+
+ if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_ENQCMD))
+ return;
Which is it, and why do we need the CONFIG thing when combined with the
enabled thing?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists