[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200628115245.9638-3-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 13:52:45 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@...vell.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>,
Jan Glauber <jan.glauber@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/2] i2c: octeon: check correct size of maximum RECV_LEN packet
I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX defines already the maximum number as defined in the
SMBus 2.0 specs. I don't see a reason to add 1 here.
Fixes: 886f6f8337dd ("i2c: octeon: Support I2C_M_RECV_LEN")
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
---
Only build tested, I don't have the HW. Please let me know if I
overlooked something, but to the best of my knowledge, this +1 is wrong.
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon-core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon-core.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon-core.c
index d9607905dc2f..845eda70b8ca 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon-core.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon-core.c
@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ static int octeon_i2c_read(struct octeon_i2c *i2c, int target,
if (result)
return result;
if (recv_len && i == 0) {
- if (data[i] > I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX + 1)
+ if (data[i] > I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX)
return -EPROTO;
length += data[i];
}
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists