lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200628115245.9638-2-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Date:   Sun, 28 Jun 2020 13:52:44 +0200
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To:     linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
        Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@...lanox.com>,
        Michael Shych <michaelsh@...lanox.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/2] i2c: mlxcpld: check correct size of maximum RECV_LEN packet

I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX defines already the maximum number as defined in the
SMBus 2.0 specs. I don't see a reason to add 1 here. Also, fix the errno
to what is suggested for this error.

Fixes: c9bfdc7c16cb ("i2c: mlxcpld: Add support for smbus block read transaction")
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
---

Only build tested, I don't have the HW. Please let me know if I
overlooked something, but to the best of my knowledge, this +1 is wrong.

 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mlxcpld.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mlxcpld.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mlxcpld.c
index 2fd717d8dd30..71d7bae2cbca 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mlxcpld.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mlxcpld.c
@@ -337,9 +337,9 @@ static int mlxcpld_i2c_wait_for_tc(struct mlxcpld_i2c_priv *priv)
 		if (priv->smbus_block && (val & MLXCPLD_I2C_SMBUS_BLK_BIT)) {
 			mlxcpld_i2c_read_comm(priv, MLXCPLD_LPCI2C_NUM_DAT_REG,
 					      &datalen, 1);
-			if (unlikely(datalen > (I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX + 1))) {
+			if (unlikely(datalen > I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX)) {
 				dev_err(priv->dev, "Incorrect smbus block read message len\n");
-				return -E2BIG;
+				return -EPROTO;
 			}
 		} else {
 			datalen = priv->xfer.data_len;
-- 
2.20.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ