[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3470e941-aa86-11a8-674b-5258a08fedb1@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 09:45:17 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, thierry.reding@...il.com,
u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy
<yendapally.reddy@...adcom.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] pwm: bcm-iproc: Remove impossible comparison when
validating duty cycle
On 6/29/2020 5:47 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> 'duty' here is an unsigned int, thus checking for <0 will always
> evaluate to false.
>
> Fixes the following W=1 warning:
>
> drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c:147:12: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
>
> Cc: Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>
> Cc: Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>
> Cc: Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy <yendapally.reddy@...adcom.com>
> Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com
> Cc: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
And IPROC_PWM_DUTY_CYCLE_MIN is unused after remove this single use of
the define, if you also remove it you can add:
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists