linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] s390x/vmem: get rid of memory segment list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 29 Jun 2020 14:07:23 +0200
From:   Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc:     Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] s390x/vmem: get rid of memory segment list

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 02:01:22PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 29.06.20 13:55, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 08:46:21PM +0200, Gerald Schaefer wrote:
> >> Verified with DCSS overlapping boot and standby memory, works fine.
> >> As expected, the error message changes, but I don't think that is a
> >> problem, as long as you also remove the old -ENOSPC case / comment
> >> in arch/s390/mm/extmem.c. It is actually more correct now I guess,
> >> -ENOSPC doesn't look like the correct return value anyway.
> >>
> >> Thanks for cleaning up! Looks good to me, and removes > 100 LOC,
> >> unless Heiko remembers some other issues from ancient times.
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>
> >> Tested-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com> [DCSS]
> > 
> > Looks good to me too. Gerald, thanks for looking and verifying this,
> > and David, thanks for providing the patch.
> > 
> > Applied.
> > 
> 
> Thanks Gerald and Heiko! Should I send an addon patch to tweak the
> documentation or resend this patch?

Please send an addon patch. I will merge it.