linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] s390x/vmem: get rid of memory segment list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0c783dbb-630c-6440-74b8-8b40af146d6a@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 29 Jun 2020 14:01:22 +0200
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] s390x/vmem: get rid of memory segment list

On 29.06.20 13:55, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 08:46:21PM +0200, Gerald Schaefer wrote:
>> Verified with DCSS overlapping boot and standby memory, works fine.
>> As expected, the error message changes, but I don't think that is a
>> problem, as long as you also remove the old -ENOSPC case / comment
>> in arch/s390/mm/extmem.c. It is actually more correct now I guess,
>> -ENOSPC doesn't look like the correct return value anyway.
>>
>> Thanks for cleaning up! Looks good to me, and removes > 100 LOC,
>> unless Heiko remembers some other issues from ancient times.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>
>> Tested-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com> [DCSS]
> 
> Looks good to me too. Gerald, thanks for looking and verifying this,
> and David, thanks for providing the patch.
> 
> Applied.
> 

Thanks Gerald and Heiko! Should I send an addon patch to tweak the
documentation or resend this patch?

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb