linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] i2c: stm32f7: Add SMBus-specific protocols support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200630151115.GA1058@kunai>
Date:   Tue, 30 Jun 2020 17:11:15 +0200
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To:     Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        pierre-yves.mordret@...com, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
        alexandre.torgue@...com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        fabrice.gasnier@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] i2c: stm32f7: Add SMBus-specific protocols support

Hi Alain,

> Ok, understood. Fine for me that way as well. I am just a little worrying that
> the "host-notify" can now be present in both controller AND slave nodes
> and might be a bit hard to understand. At the same time I don't have a better
> proposal for naming the binding for the controller.

It is a valid concern, maybe we could name the binding for the host
"enable-host-notify"?

> Please do not consider serie v2 I just posted few days ago and I will
> post a serie v3 updating the binding information and using the host-notify
> binding in the i2c-stm32f7 driver.

I also have an idea for the SMBusAlert topic, hopefully I can come up
with a summary later today.

All the best,

   Wolfram


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)