lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d48be7a9-ee18-956b-a14f-7eda08aa7bc0@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 1 Jul 2020 08:56:25 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com, dwagner@...e.de, tobin@...nel.org,
        cl@...ux.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ying.huang@...el.com,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, cai@....pw
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/vmscan: move RECLAIM* bits to uapi header

On 7/1/20 8:46 AM, Ben Widawsky wrote:
>> +/*
>> + * These bit locations are exposed in the vm.zone_reclaim_mode sysctl
>> + * ABI.  New bits are OK, but existing bits can never change.
>> + */
>> +#define RECLAIM_ZONE  (1<<0)	/* Run shrink_inactive_list on the zone */
>> +#define RECLAIM_WRITE (1<<1)	/* Writeout pages during reclaim */
>> +#define RECLAIM_UNMAP (1<<2)	/* Unmap pages during reclaim */
> Have you considered turning this into an enum while moving it?

The thought occurred to me, but all of the other bits in the uapi file
were defined this way.  I decided to not not attempt to buck the trend
in their new home.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ