[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200701160046.kvhsq43adcw46fbq@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 09:00:46 -0700
From: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@...el.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com, dwagner@...e.de, tobin@...nel.org,
cl@...ux.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ying.huang@...el.com,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, cai@....pw
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] [v2] Repair and clean up vm.zone_reclaim_mode sysctl
ABI
On 20-07-01 08:26:21, Dave Hansen wrote:
> A previous cleanup accidentally changed the vm.zone_reclaim_mode ABI.
>
> This series restores the ABI and then reorganizes the code to make
> the ABI more obvious. Since the single-patch v1[1], I've:
>
> * Restored the RECLAIM_ZONE naming, comment and Documentation now
> that the implicit checks for it are known.
> * Move RECLAIM_* definitions to a uapi header
> * Add a node_reclaim_enabled() helper
>
> Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/vm.rst | 10 +++++-----
> include/linux/swap.h | 7 +++++++
> include/uapi/linux/mempolicy.h | 7 +++++++
> mm/khugepaged.c | 2 +-
> mm/page_alloc.c | 2 +-
> mm/vmscan.c | 3 ---
> 6 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> 1. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20200626003459.D8E015CA@viggo.jf.intel.com/
>
> Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@...el.com>
> Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Cc: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
> Cc: "Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@...nel.org>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
> Cc: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
Series is:
Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@...el.com>
I was more thorough this time in checking all uses of node_reclaim_mode :-). I
do think in patch 2/3, using an enum would be a little better, which I've
mentioned there.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists