[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200701164045.GA3163341@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 18:40:45 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: sh-sci: Initialize spinlock for uart console
On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 04:41:40PM +0100, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> serial core expects the spinlock to be initialized by the controller
> driver for serial console, this patch makes sure the spinlock is
> initialized, fixing the below issue:
>
> [ 0.865928] BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0, swapper/0/1
> [ 0.865945] lock: sci_ports+0x0/0x4c80, .magic: 00000000, .owner: <none>/-1, .owner_cpu: 0
> [ 0.865955] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.8.0-rc1+ #112
> [ 0.865961] Hardware name: HopeRun HiHope RZ/G2H with sub board (DT)
> [ 0.865968] Call trace:
> [ 0.865979] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1d8
> [ 0.865985] show_stack+0x14/0x20
> [ 0.865996] dump_stack+0xe8/0x130
> [ 0.866006] spin_dump+0x6c/0x88
> [ 0.866012] do_raw_spin_lock+0xb0/0xf8
> [ 0.866023] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x80/0xa0
> [ 0.866032] uart_add_one_port+0x3a4/0x4e0
> [ 0.866039] sci_probe+0x504/0x7c8
> [ 0.866048] platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xa0
> [ 0.866059] really_probe+0xdc/0x330
> [ 0.866066] driver_probe_device+0x58/0xb8
> [ 0.866072] device_driver_attach+0x6c/0x90
> [ 0.866078] __driver_attach+0x88/0xd0
> [ 0.866085] bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xc8
> [ 0.866091] driver_attach+0x20/0x28
> [ 0.866098] bus_add_driver+0x14c/0x1f8
> [ 0.866104] driver_register+0x60/0x110
> [ 0.866109] __platform_driver_register+0x40/0x48
> [ 0.866119] sci_init+0x2c/0x34
> [ 0.866127] do_one_initcall+0x88/0x428
> [ 0.866137] kernel_init_freeable+0x2c0/0x328
> [ 0.866143] kernel_init+0x10/0x108
> [ 0.866150] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> Reviewed-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
This should be backported to older kernels too, right? How far back?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists