lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 13:20:01 +0200 From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> To: Vinay Simha B N <simhavcs@...il.com> Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>, Ken-Sue.Tan@...c.toshiba.com, Chris.Cheng@...c.toshiba.com, Bhushan.Patel@...c.toshiba.com, "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "open list:DRM DRIVERS" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-binding: Add DSI/LVDS TC358775 bridge bindings Hi Vinay. On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 03:14:09PM +0530, Vinay Simha B N wrote: > sam, > > I rechecked, but did not find any indents are too spaced. > This is taken from a working dts tree. > port@1 { | reg = <1>; | dsi0_out: endpoint { | remote-endpoint = <&d2l_in_test>; | data-lanes = <0 1 2 3>; | }; }; }; }; See above, something is wrong with the indent in the examples. > I had given two examples for a purpose. One for single lvds > configuration single link mode, > another is for dual lvds configurations dual-link mode and port mappings. Please provide a proper description of the single link and dual link modes in the descriptions of the bindings. The examples shall support the bindings, they shall not include information that is not covered in the bindings. Sam
Powered by blists - more mailing lists