[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200701112001.GA652928@ravnborg.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 13:20:01 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Vinay Simha B N <simhavcs@...il.com>
Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Ken-Sue.Tan@...c.toshiba.com, Chris.Cheng@...c.toshiba.com,
Bhushan.Patel@...c.toshiba.com,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DRM DRIVERS" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-binding: Add DSI/LVDS TC358775 bridge bindings
Hi Vinay.
On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 03:14:09PM +0530, Vinay Simha B N wrote:
> sam,
>
> I rechecked, but did not find any indents are too spaced.
> This is taken from a working dts tree.
>
port@1 {
| reg = <1>;
| dsi0_out: endpoint {
| remote-endpoint = <&d2l_in_test>;
| data-lanes = <0 1 2 3>;
| };
};
};
};
See above, something is wrong with the indent in the examples.
> I had given two examples for a purpose. One for single lvds
> configuration single link mode,
> another is for dual lvds configurations dual-link mode and port mappings.
Please provide a proper description of the single link and dual link
modes in the descriptions of the bindings.
The examples shall support the bindings, they shall not include
information that is not covered in the bindings.
Sam
Powered by blists - more mailing lists