[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOJsxLEYHzjgMtXgbkoWYvU+Lf_08GPkMAFqibnEwARNzxJZxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 14:46:24 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...il.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/26] mm/riscv: Use general page fault accounting
Hi Peter,
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 1:36 AM Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com> wrote:
> Use the general page fault accounting by passing regs into handle_mm_fault().
> It naturally solve the issue of multiple page fault accounting when page fault
> retry happened.
I sent a patch to fix up riscv page fault accounting some days ago:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/2020-June/000775.html
However, your fix is obviously even better. For the generic and riscv parts:
Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
- Pekka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists