[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKCA56D-jHF80J7u=YGcwE-+d6AjNfrbkin5AbavKAJPCqkygg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 09:38:28 -0700
From: Chu Lin <linchuyuan@...gle.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: jdelvare@...e.com, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jason Ling <jasonling@...gle.com>,
Kais Belgaied <belgaied@...gle.com>,
Zhongqi Li <zhongqil@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon:max6697: Allow max6581 to create tempX_offset attributes
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 10:14 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 01:42:23AM +0000, Chu Lin wrote:
> > Per max6581, reg 4d and reg 4e is used for temperature read offset.
> > This patch will let the user specify the temperature read offset for
> > max6581. This patch is tested on max6581 and only applies to max6581.
> >
> Patchwork received four versions of this patch, with two different
> subject lines.
>
> How am I supposed to know which one to look at ?
Sorry for the confusion.
I was learning how to send amendments to a patch and forget that
it may create confusion for the reviewers. The latest one with headline
hwmon:max6697: Allow max6581 to create tempX_offset attributes is the one that
should be reviewed.
Chu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists