[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c0093731-fa42-9d43-ebfc-208ba51a96c5@loongson.cn>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 19:53:47 +0800
From: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
linux-csky@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/14] irqchip/csky-apb-intc: Fix potential resource
leaks
On 07/02/2020 04:05 PM, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> On 07/02/2020 03:19 PM, Markus Elfring wrote:
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-csky-apb-intc.c
>> …
>>>> I suggest to recheck the parameter alignment for such a function call.
>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst?id=7c30b859a947535f2213277e827d7ac7dcff9c84#n93
>>>>
>>> OK, thank you, like this:
>>>
>>> - ret = irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips(root_domain, 32, 1,
>>> - "csky_intc", handle_level_irq,
>>> - IRQ_NOREQUEST | IRQ_NOPROBE | IRQ_NOAUTOEN,
>>> 0, 0);
>>> - if (ret) {
>>> + if (irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips(root_domain, 32, 1,
>>> + "csky_intc",
>>> handle_level_irq,
>>> + IRQ_NOREQUEST |
>>> IRQ_NOPROBE | IRQ_NOAUTOEN, 0, 0)) {
>>> pr_err("C-SKY Intc irq_alloc_gc failed.\n");
>> …
>>
>> Would you like to use also horizontal tab characters for the
>> corresponding indentation?
>
> Sorry, I do not quite understanding what you mean, maybe like this?
>
> if (irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips(root_domain, 32, 1,
> "csky_intc", handle_level_irq,
> IRQ_NOREQUEST | IRQ_NOPROBE | IRQ_NOAUTOEN, 0, 0)) {
> pr_err("C-SKY Intc irq_alloc_gc failed.\n");
> goto err_domain_remove;
> }
>
Hi Markus,
Thank you very much for your review and suggestion.
Maybe still use "ret" variable is better, the following is another comment
which is only sent to me:
[I think that if one of the return values comes from a function call, then
you should use the value from the function call even if it is currently
always -ENOMEM. The return value of the function call could perhaps
change in the future.
In any case, ret = foo(); if (ret) is very common in kernel code, and
there is no reason not to do it, especially when the function call takes
up a lot of space.]
Let us keep it as it is to make the code clear and to avoid the
alignment issue:
ret = foo();
if (ret) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto ...
}
Thanks,
Tiezhu
>>
>> Regards,
>> Markus
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists