[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200702214852.f6ab03dc8d072abf35359d3b@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 21:48:52 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/memblock: expose only miminal interface to
add/walk physmem
On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 09:23:10 +0200 David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
> >>> ---
> >>> arch/s390/kernel/crash_dump.c | 6 ++--
> >>> include/linux/memblock.h | 28 ++++++++++++++---
> >>> mm/memblock.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> >>> 3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> >
> > So I guess this should go via the s390 tree, since the second patch of
> > this series can go only upstream if both this patch and a patch which
> > is currently only on our features are merged before.
> >
> > Any objections?
>
> @Andrew, fine with you if this goes via the s390 tree?
Sure, please go ahead.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists