linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/memblock: expose only miminal interface to add/walk physmem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 2 Jul 2020 21:48:52 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc:     Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/memblock: expose only miminal interface to
 add/walk physmem

On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 09:23:10 +0200 David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:

> >>> ---
> >>>  arch/s390/kernel/crash_dump.c |  6 ++--
> >>>  include/linux/memblock.h      | 28 ++++++++++++++---
> >>>  mm/memblock.c                 | 57 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> >>>  3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> > 
> > So I guess this should go via the s390 tree, since the second patch of
> > this series can go only upstream if both this patch and a patch which
> > is currently only on our features are merged before.
> > 
> > Any objections?
> 
> @Andrew, fine with you if this goes via the s390 tree?

Sure, please go ahead.