[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200703083154.GD4582@osiris>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 10:31:54 +0200
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/memblock: expose only miminal interface to
add/walk physmem
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 09:48:52PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 09:23:10 +0200 David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > >>> ---
> > >>> arch/s390/kernel/crash_dump.c | 6 ++--
> > >>> include/linux/memblock.h | 28 ++++++++++++++---
> > >>> mm/memblock.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > >>> 3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > So I guess this should go via the s390 tree, since the second patch of
> > > this series can go only upstream if both this patch and a patch which
> > > is currently only on our features are merged before.
> > >
> > > Any objections?
> >
> > @Andrew, fine with you if this goes via the s390 tree?
>
> Sure, please go ahead.
Ok, applied both patches. Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists