linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/30] usb: dwc2: gadget: Avoid pointless read of EP control register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 Jul 2020 08:35:39 +0000
From:   Minas Harutyunyan <Minas.Harutyunyan@...opsys.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Minas Harutyunyan <Minas.Harutyunyan@...opsys.com>
CC:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ben Dooks <ben@...tec.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/30] usb: dwc2: gadget: Avoid pointless read of EP
 control register

Hi,

On 7/3/2020 11:43 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 07:38:16AM +0000, Minas Harutyunyan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 7/3/2020 11:29 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 03:46:06PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>> Commit ec1f9d9f01384 ("usb: dwc2: gadget: parity fix in isochronous mode") moved
>>>> these checks to dwc2_hsotg_change_ep_iso_parity() back in 2015.  The assigned
>>>> value hasn't been read back since.  Let's remove the unnecessary H/W read.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes the following W=1 warning:
>>>>
>>>>    drivers/usb/dwc2/gadget.c: In function ‘dwc2_hsotg_epint’:
>>>>    drivers/usb/dwc2/gadget.c:2981:6: warning: variable ‘ctrl’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>>>>    2981 | u32 ctrl;
>>>>    | ^~~~
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Minas Harutyunyan <hminas@...opsys.com>
>>>> Cc: Ben Dooks <ben@...tec.co.uk>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/usb/dwc2/gadget.c | 2 --
>>>>    1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc2/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc2/gadget.c
>>>> index 116e6175c7a48..fa07e3fcb8841 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc2/gadget.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc2/gadget.c
>>>> @@ -2975,10 +2975,8 @@ static void dwc2_hsotg_epint(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg, unsigned int idx,
>>>>    	u32 epctl_reg = dir_in ? DIEPCTL(idx) : DOEPCTL(idx);
>>>>    	u32 epsiz_reg = dir_in ? DIEPTSIZ(idx) : DOEPTSIZ(idx);
>>>>    	u32 ints;
>>>> -	u32 ctrl;
>>>>    
>>>>    	ints = dwc2_gadget_read_ep_interrupts(hsotg, idx, dir_in);
>>>> -	ctrl = dwc2_readl(hsotg, epctl_reg);
>>>
>>> As you know, lots of hardware requires reads to happen to do things, so
>>> are you sure it is safe to remove this read call?
>>>
>>
>> Greg, yes, it's Ok to remove this unnecessary read which remained from
>> previous implementations.
> 
> Great, thanks for confirming!
> 

Acked-by: Minas Harutyunyan <hminas@...opsys.com>

> greg k-h
>