[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200703104448.iwhxk77d2hyrr3x5@core.my.home>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 12:44:48 +0200
From: Ondřej Jirman <megous@...ous.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Guido Günther <agx@...xcpu.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Purism Kernel Team <kernel@...i.sm>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Bhushan Shah <bshah@....org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com, Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>,
Martijn Braam <martijn@...xit.nl>,
Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 02/13] dt-bindings: panel: Convert rocktech,
jh057n00900 to yaml
Hello Sam,
On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 07:11:55AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Ondrej.
>
> > > My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch:
> > >
> > > /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/nwl-dsi.example.dt.yaml: panel@0: '#address-cells', '#size-cells', 'port@0' do not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> > > /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/nwl-dsi.example.dt.yaml: panel@0: 'vcc-supply' is a required property
> > > /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/nwl-dsi.example.dt.yaml: panel@0: 'iovcc-supply' is a required property
> > > /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/nwl-dsi.example.dt.yaml: panel@0: 'reset-gpios' is a required property
> >
> > Paths look bogus ^^^^
> >
> > It should be .../rocktech,jh057n00900.yaml: ...
>
> The example in nwl-dsi.yaml contains:
> compatible = "rocktech,jh057n00900";
>
> So the example is checked against your updated binding.
> And the binding check fails because the example is no longer valid.
Ah, now I understand.
> This needs to be fixed as we do not wat to introduce new errors.
> Either the example or the binding needs the fix.
I think we can unrequire the supplies, but reset is needed really.
The panel only has one port, so there should be no address/size-cells
in the example, and port@0 should be just port to match existing binding.
If it had multiple ports, port@0 would have to be inside ports { } node
anyway, according to the existing binding. Then add reset-gpios to
the example...
And that should fix it.
I'll prepare the patch shortly.
regards,
o.
> Sam
>
>
> >
> > regards,
> > o.
> >
> > >
> > > See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1320690
> > >
> > > If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
> > > error(s), then make sure dt-schema is up to date:
> > >
> > > pip3 install git+https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema.git@master --upgrade
> > >
> > > Please check and re-submit.
> > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists