[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <jhjo8oug7pd.mognet@arm.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2020 00:51:26 +0100
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] genirq: Kill preflow handlers
Hi Marc,
On 04/07/20 10:48, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Valentin,
>
> On 2020-07-03 16:56, Valentin Schneider wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> while strolling around the different flow handlers, I tried to make
>> sense of
>> what preflow_handler() was about. Turns out no one uses those anymore,
>> but the
>> genirq support has remained in place.
>
> If we needed to reintroduce some form of preflow handler, we'd try and
> do it using hierarchical irqchips, if at all possible.
Right, that does sound like the most sensible approach. If I got my history
right, the preflow handlers saw the light of day before hierarchical
domains did, which I suppose is a reason why it wasn't done that way back
then.
>
>>
>> Unless we can see another user of those in the near future, this seems
>> like as
>> good a time as any for a little housecleaning.
>>
>> - Patch 1 simply deselects the (unexploited) preflow Kconfig for
>> sparc64
>> - Patch 2 is the actual cleanup
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Valentin
>>
>> Valentin Schneider (2):
>> sparc64: Deselect IRQ_PREFLOW_FASTEOI
>> genirq: Remove preflow handler support
>>
>> arch/sparc/Kconfig | 1 -
>> include/linux/irqdesc.h | 15 ---------------
>> include/linux/irqhandler.h | 1 -
>> kernel/irq/Kconfig | 4 ----
>> kernel/irq/chip.c | 13 -------------
>> 5 files changed, 34 deletions(-)
>
> For the whole series, and assuming that there is no regression
> (can't imagine any for unused code):
>
> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
>
Thanks!
> Thanks,
>
> M.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists