lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 5 Jul 2020 15:00:47 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@...sung.com>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        bcrl@...ck.org
Cc:     hch@...radead.org, Damien.LeMoal@....com, asml.silence@...il.com,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, mb@...htnvm.io,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-aio@...ck.org,
        io-uring@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        Selvakumar S <selvakuma.s1@...sung.com>,
        Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@...sung.com>,
        Javier Gonzalez <javier.gonz@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] io_uring: add support for zone-append

On 7/5/20 12:47 PM, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
> From: Selvakumar S <selvakuma.s1@...sung.com>
> 
> For zone-append, block-layer will return zone-relative offset via ret2
> of ki_complete interface. Make changes to collect it, and send to
> user-space using cqe->flags.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Selvakumar S <selvakuma.s1@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Gonzalez <javier.gonz@...sung.com>
> ---
>  fs/io_uring.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index 155f3d8..cbde4df 100644
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@ -402,6 +402,8 @@ struct io_rw {
>  	struct kiocb			kiocb;
>  	u64				addr;
>  	u64				len;
> +	/* zone-relative offset for append, in sectors */
> +	u32			append_offset;
>  };

I don't like this very much at all. As it stands, the first cacheline
of io_kiocb is set aside for request-private data. io_rw is already
exactly 64 bytes, which means that you're now growing io_rw beyond
a cacheline and increasing the size of io_kiocb as a whole.

Maybe you can reuse io_rw->len for this, as that is only used on the
submission side of things.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists