lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 5 Jul 2020 23:09:42 +0200
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To:     Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@...rochip.com>
Cc:     linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com,
        nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
        linux@...linux.org.uk, kamel.bouhara@...tlin.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] i2c: core: add generic GPIO bus recovery

On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 05:19:00PM +0300, Codrin Ciubotariu wrote:
> GPIO recovery has been added already for some I2C bus drivers, such as
> imx, pxa and at91. These drivers use similar bindings and have more or
> less the same code for recovery. For this reason, we aim to move the
> GPIO bus recovery implementation to the I2C core so that other drivers
> can benefit from it, with small modifications.
> This implementation initializes the pinctrl states and the SDA/SCL
> GPIOs based on common bindings. The I2C bus drivers can still use
> different bindings or other particular recovery steps if needed.
> The ugly part with this patch series is the handle of PROBE_DEFER
> which could be returned by devm_gpiod_get(). This changes things a
> little for i2c_register_adapter() and for this reason this step is
> implemented in a sperate patch.
> The at91 Microchip driver is the first to use this implementation,
> with an AI to move the rest of the drivers in the following steps.

Thanks for doing this! On a first high level review, this looks very
good. I have one question in patch 1. From Tuesday on, I'll be
off-the-net for two weeks. Still I think it will be all good for the 5.9
merge window unless we encounter an unexpected problem. But as said, so
far it is looking good!


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists