linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] watchdog: Add common nowayout parameter to booke

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ed8ba33f-b3d4-8070-e0ca-fdaf4668cf91@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Mon, 6 Jul 2020 15:18:35 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Timothy Myers <timothy.myers@...ran.com>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        "linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Boike <david.boike@...ran.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] watchdog: Add common nowayout parameter to
 booke_wdt driver

On 7/6/20 9:33 AM, Timothy Myers wrote:
> Add the common "nowayout" parameter to booke_wdt to make this behavior
> selectable at runtime and to make the implementation more consistent with
> many other watchdog drivers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Timothy Myers <timothy.myers@...ran.com>
> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> 
> Changes in:
> 	v2:
> 		Added Guenter Roeck's reviewed-by tag at his request
> 	v3:
> 		Fix whitespace formatting in message.
> ---

Change log goes here.

I applied your patch to watchdog-next, but there is still something
in it which prevents it from showing up at
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-watchdog/list/, even though
I do see it at https://lore.kernel.org/linux-watchdog/.

Looking into the e-mail source, I think the problem may be due
to some Outlook specific formatting in the raw message:

Add the common "nowayout" parameter to booke_wdt to make this behavior=0A=
selectable at runtime and to make the implementation more consistent with=
=0A=
many other watchdog drivers.=0A=
=0A=

and so on. If that is persistent, it may make sense to fix it, or
you might wonder why some of your patches are being ignored.

Thanks,
Guenter