[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202007051819.0ECAD4E6@keescook>
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2020 18:19:56 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@...ive.com>,
Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-csky@...r.kernel.org, Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>,
Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>,
Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: Add STACKPROTECTOR supported
On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 08:55:35AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 4:31 AM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> > Sure -- I assume get_cycles64() is architecturally "simple"? (i.e. it
> > doesn't require that the entire time-keeping subsystem has started?)
> Yes, it's just a csr read. But it's necessary? get_random_bytes should enough.
Well, that depends on how early _all_ riscv platforms are able to
initialize their random pool correctly. I'd include a csr mix.
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists