[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200706182713.3693762-1-nhuck@google.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 18:27:13 +0000
From: Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@...gle.com>
To: linux@...linux.org.uk, vincent.whitchurch@...s.com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com,
Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@...gle.com>,
Miles Chen <miles.chen@...iatek.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: stacktrace: Fix unwind_frame for clang-built kernels
Since clang does not push pc and sp in function prologues, the current
implementation of unwind_frame does not work. By using the previous
frame's lr/fp instead of saved pc/sp we get valid unwinds on clang-built
kernels.
The bounds check on next frame pointer must be changed as well since
there are 8 less bytes between frames.
This fixes /proc/<pid>/stack.
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/912
Reported-by: Miles Chen <miles.chen@...iatek.com>
Tested-by: Miles Chen <miles.chen@...iatek.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@...gle.com>
---
arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c
index cc726afea023..76ea4178a55c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -22,6 +22,19 @@
* A simple function epilogue looks like this:
* ldm sp, {fp, sp, pc}
*
+ * When compiled with clang, pc and sp are not pushed. A simple function
+ * prologue looks like this when built with clang:
+ *
+ * stmdb {..., fp, lr}
+ * add fp, sp, #x
+ * sub sp, sp, #y
+ *
+ * A simple function epilogue looks like this when built with clang:
+ *
+ * sub sp, fp, #x
+ * ldm {..., fp, pc}
+ *
+ *
* Note that with framepointer enabled, even the leaf functions have the same
* prologue and epilogue, therefore we can ignore the LR value in this case.
*/
@@ -34,6 +47,16 @@ int notrace unwind_frame(struct stackframe *frame)
low = frame->sp;
high = ALIGN(low, THREAD_SIZE);
+#ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
+ /* check current frame pointer is within bounds */
+ if (fp < low + 4 || fp > high - 4)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ frame->sp = frame->fp;
+ frame->fp = *(unsigned long *)(fp);
+ frame->pc = frame->lr;
+ frame->lr = *(unsigned long *)(fp + 4);
+#else
/* check current frame pointer is within bounds */
if (fp < low + 12 || fp > high - 4)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -42,6 +65,7 @@ int notrace unwind_frame(struct stackframe *frame)
frame->fp = *(unsigned long *)(fp - 12);
frame->sp = *(unsigned long *)(fp - 8);
frame->pc = *(unsigned long *)(fp - 4);
+#endif
return 0;
}
--
2.27.0.212.ge8ba1cc988-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists