[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6dbaf551-125e-bc7f-0b5f-655b48432ab2@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 11:57:30 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, vkoul@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de
Cc: Jing Lin <jing.lin@...el.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, ashok.raj@...el.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] dmaengine: idxd: add ABI documentation for shared
wq
On 7/6/20 11:22 AM, Dave Jiang wrote:
> +What: /sys/bus/dsa/devices/dsa<m>/pasid_enabled
> +Date: Jul 5, 2020
> +KernelVersion: 5.9.0
> +Contact: dmaengine@...r.kernel.org
> +Description: To indicate if PASID (process address space identifier) is
> + enabled or not for this device.
> +
> What: /sys/bus/dsa/devices/dsa<m>/state
> Date: Oct 25, 2019
> KernelVersion: 5.6.0
> @@ -116,6 +123,13 @@ Description: The maximum number of bandwidth tokens that may be in use at
> one time by operations that access low bandwidth memory in the
> device.
>
> +What: /sys/bus/dsa/devices/wq<m>.<n>/block_on_fault
> +Date: Jul 5, 2020
> +KernelVersion: 5.9.0
> +Contact: dmaengine@...r.kernel.org
> +Description: To indicate block on fault is allowed or not for the work queue
> + to support on demand paging.
I'd also really appreciate some more "why" in addition to the "what" in
the documentation. Why would a program or end user care that PASIDs are
enabled or that on-demand paging is supported?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists