[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 08:49:16 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>,
Matt Denton <mpdenton@...gle.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Chris Palmer <palmer@...gle.com>,
Robert Sesek <rsesek@...gle.com>,
Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/7] fs: Move __scm_install_fd() to __receive_fd()
On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 01:17:15PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> In preparation for users of the "install a received file" logic outside
> of net/ (pidfd and seccomp), relocate and rename __scm_install_fd() from
> net/core/scm.c to __receive_fd() in fs/file.c, and provide a wrapper
> named receive_fd_user(), as future patches will change the interface
> to __receive_fd().
Why the __ prefix if there is no receive_fd()?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists