[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 08:47:42 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
christian@...uner.io, shuah@...nel.org,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] selftests: pidfd: prefer ksft_test_result_skip to
ksft_exit_*
On 7/7/20 7:52 AM, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 06:19:34AM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Calling ksft_exit_* results in executing fewer tests than planned, which
>> is wrong for ksft_exit_skip or suboptimal (because it results in a bail
>> out) for ksft_exit_fail_msg.
>>
>> Using ksft_test_result_skip instead skips only one test and lets the
>> test plan proceed as promised by ksft_set_plan.
>>
>> Paolo
>
> Thanks for fixing this, Paolo!
> Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
>
> Shuah, want me to take it or do you want to take it?
>
I will apply it to my tree with Paolo's other patches in this series.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists