[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200709180909.GO9832@raspberrypi>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 13:09:09 -0500
From: Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: steve.wahl@....com, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>,
Mike Travis <mike.travis@....com>,
Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@....com>,
Benjamin Thiel <b.thiel@...teo.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Austin Kim <austindh.kim@...il.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
Russ Anderson <rja@....com>
Subject: Re: [patch v2 09/13] x86: Remove efi=old_map command line option
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 09:02:01AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 7:55 AM <steve.wahl@....com> wrote:
> >
> > As a part of UV1 platform removal, delete the efi=old_map option,
> > which should no longer be needed.
>
> Can you also update kernel_parameters.txt?
>
> --Andy
I plan to, but (I mentioned in the intro email) kernel-parameters.txt
has pending changes in linux-next that conflict. (The efi= option
values were alphabetized.) So my plan is to issue a separate patch
if/when this gets accepted. If you'd like me to take a different
aproach, let me know.
--> Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists