[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdmuYc8rW_H4aQG4DsJzho=F+djd68fp7mzmBp3-wY--Uw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 11:41:47 -0700
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: alex.gaynor@...il.com, geofft@...reload.com, jbaublitz@...hat.com,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Linux kernel in-tree Rust support
Hello folks,
I'm working on putting together an LLVM "Micro Conference" for the
upcoming Linux Plumbers Conf
(https://www.linuxplumbersconf.org/event/7/page/47-attend). It's not
solidified yet, but I would really like to run a session on support
for Rust "in tree." I suspect we could cover technical aspects of
what that might look like (I have a prototype of that, was trivial to
wire up KBuild support), but also a larger question of "should we do
this?" or "how might we place limits on where this can be used?"
Question to folks explicitly in To:, are you planning on attending plumbers?
If so, would this be an interesting topic that you'd participate in?
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists