[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72n51z9QtFdj1cF72hhQikq7jxCA+TmKKSQcYo34WAPGsw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 22:52:42 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc: alex.gaynor@...il.com, geofft@...reload.com, jbaublitz@...hat.com,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Linux kernel in-tree Rust support
Hi Nick,
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 8:42 PM Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
> I'm working on putting together an LLVM "Micro Conference" for the
> upcoming Linux Plumbers Conf
> (https://www.linuxplumbersconf.org/event/7/page/47-attend). It's not
> solidified yet, but I would really like to run a session on support
> for Rust "in tree." I suspect we could cover technical aspects of
> what that might look like (I have a prototype of that, was trivial to
Agreed, I wrote one ~half a year ago that compiled TUs through rustc
mimicking what we do with cc to some degree (i.e. no cargo etc.), and
it was quite pleasant.
> wire up KBuild support), but also a larger question of "should we do
> this?" or "how might we place limits on where this can be used?"
Indeed, I would say that is going to be the major topic, not so much
the technical bits.
> Question to folks explicitly in To:, are you planning on attending plumbers?
I wasn't, but it definitely is an interesting topic that I wouldn't
want to miss!
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists