[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <78a55ead-d6c1-578c-0fb6-78dd0ef117b6@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 11:14:18 +0100
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Rohit Kumar <rohitkr@...eaurora.org>, agross@...nel.org,
bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
broonie@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, plai@...eaurora.org,
bgoswami@...eaurora.org, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] dt-bindings: sound: lpass-cpu: Add sc7180 lpass
cpu node
On 09/07/2020 11:12, Rohit Kumar wrote:
>
> On 7/9/2020 3:38 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/07/2020 11:01, Rohit Kumar wrote:
>>>
>>> On 7/9/2020 2:57 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 08/07/2020 06:08, Rohit kumar wrote:
>>>>> Add dt-bindings to support "qcom,lpass-cpu-sc7180" node.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Rohit kumar <rohitkr@...eaurora.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,lpass-cpu.txt | 3 ++-
>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git
>>>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,lpass-cpu.txt
>>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,lpass-cpu.txt
>>>>> index 32c2cdb..04e34cc 100644
>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,lpass-cpu.txt
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,lpass-cpu.txt
>>>>> @@ -4,7 +4,8 @@ This node models the Qualcomm Technologies
>>>>> Low-Power Audio SubSystem (LPASS).
>>>>> Required properties:
>>>>> -- compatible : "qcom,lpass-cpu" or "qcom,apq8016-lpass-cpu"
>>>>> +- compatible : "qcom,lpass-cpu" or "qcom,apq8016-lpass-cpu" or
>>>>> + "qcom,lpass-cpu-sc7180"
>>>>> - clocks : Must contain an entry for each entry in
>>>>> clock-names.
>>>>> - clock-names : A list which must include the following
>>>>> entries:
>>>>> * "ahbix-clk"
>>>>
>>>> Can you also list the clocks that are mandatory for this SoC.
>>>>
>>>> --srini
>>>>
>>> Will it be fine if I update it in patch 8 only where we have moved to
>>> yaml format?
>>>
>> May be reverse the order, Convert to Yaml first and then add sc7180!
>
> Actually Mark suggested to keep yaml change at the end of patch series
> as there
>
> are pending yaml patch reviews and it might take time. If we keep yaml
> change before sc7180
>
> change, then it will get blocked until yaml review. For now, I can
> update in exisiting
>
> documentation. Please suggest.
Then these clocks need to be documented in this patch itself!
--srini
>
> Thanks
>
>>
>> --srini
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Rohit
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists