linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-geni-qcom: Set the clock properly at runtime resume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD=FV=XrD0TMCNG-2JZ6_f67+yU8Z+2ofkqMvp=uA9rB2bS6og@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Jul 2020 07:44:26 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Akash Asthana <akashast@...eaurora.org>,
        Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>, ctheegal@...eaurora.org,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-geni-qcom: Set the clock properly at runtime resume

Hi,

On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 1:55 AM Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 7/9/2020 5:09 AM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > In the patch ("spi: spi-geni-qcom: Avoid clock setting if not needed")
> > we avoid a whole pile of clock code.  As part of that, we should have
> > restored the clock at runtime resume.  Do that.
> >
> > It turns out that, at least with today's configurations, this doesn't
> > actually matter.  That's because none of the current device trees have
> > an OPP table for geni SPI yet.  That makes dev_pm_opp_set_rate(dev, 0)
> > a no-op.  This is why it wasn't noticed in the testing of the original
> > patch.  It's still a good idea to fix, though.
>
> good catch, without this (and with OPP tables added) we would end up removing
> the performance vote on suspend and never put it back unless the rate changes.
> Perhaps a similar change would be needed for spi-qcom-qspi too?

The quad spi already patch had this fix and it actually mattered
there.  That's what made me go look back and realize that I needed the
fix in the geni SPI.  See:

https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200707131607.1.Ia7cb4f41ce93d37d0a764b47c8a453ce9e9c70ef@changeid

I'll send a v2 of that with Akash's suggestion of checking the return
value, though.

-Doug