linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] MT6779 IOMMU SUPPORT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 11 Jul 2020 15:11:33 +0800
From:   Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>
To:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
CC:     Chao Hao <chao.hao@...iatek.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <wsd_upstream@...iatek.com>,
        FY Yang <fy.yang@...iatek.com>, TH Yang <th.yang@...iatek.com>,
        <ming-fan.chen@...iatek.com>, <youlin.pei@...iatek.com>,
        <anan.sun@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] MT6779 IOMMU SUPPORT

On Fri, 2020-07-10 at 16:13 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 12:41:17PM +0800, Chao Hao wrote:
> > Chao Hao (10):
> >   dt-bindings: mediatek: Add bindings for MT6779
> >   iommu/mediatek: Rename the register STANDARD_AXI_MODE(0x48) to MISC_CTRL
> >   iommu/mediatek: Use a u32 flags to describe different HW features
> >   iommu/mediatek: Setting MISC_CTRL register
> >   iommu/mediatek: Move inv_sel_reg into the plat_data
> >   iommu/mediatek: Add sub_comm id in translation fault
> >   iommu/mediatek: Add REG_MMU_WR_LEN_CTRL register definition
> >   iommu/mediatek: Extend protect pa alignment value
> >   iommu/mediatek: Modify MMU_CTRL register setting
> >   iommu/mediatek: Add mt6779 basic support
> 
> Applied, thanks.

Hi Joerg,

Thanks for the apply.

The SMI part always go with the IOMMU, Could you also help apply the
mt6779 SMI basical part [1][2]. Both has already got reviewed-by from
Rob and Matthias. and the [3] in that patchset is for performance
improvement, it's not so necessary, it can be send in another patchset.


[1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1176833/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1176831/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1176832/