[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200713132929.GR27672@8bytes.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:29:29 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>
Cc: Chao Hao <chao.hao@...iatek.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, wsd_upstream@...iatek.com,
FY Yang <fy.yang@...iatek.com>, TH Yang <th.yang@...iatek.com>,
ming-fan.chen@...iatek.com, youlin.pei@...iatek.com,
anan.sun@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] MT6779 IOMMU SUPPORT
On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 03:11:33PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote:
> The SMI part always go with the IOMMU, Could you also help apply the
> mt6779 SMI basical part [1][2]. Both has already got reviewed-by from
> Rob and Matthias. and the [3] in that patchset is for performance
> improvement, it's not so necessary, it can be send in another patchset.
>
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1176833/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1176831/
Okay, applied these two to the arm/mediatek branch.
Joerg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists